Recently I read a post very similar to this one. Frugality and preserving the environment happen to be two things I am very passionate about, so I was compelled to present some ideas of my own. At the same time, I know I need to be better about some of these things.
So, this is also a way to hold myself accountable in the areas in which I am slacking.
It’s really quite interesting because the more you think about it, the more you realize that these two ideas are more compatible than you may realize. Let’s dive right in, shall we?
1. Bring Your Lunch Instead of Buying It
Remember how I said I need to get better about a lot of these? Well, bringing my lunch is what I would call exhibit A. Indeed, there are a lot of days when I feel like I should have brought my lunch, but I simply didn’t have the motivation.
Here’s the thing, though: buying my lunch means using more single-use, disposable items. If I buy my lunch, both the containers I use as well as my utensils will end up in the trash.
That’s a big deal since according to the Earth Day Network, takeout orders account for around 269,000 US tons of plastic waste that have entered the oceans.
And look – I get it. Many of us don’t think about these things because they don’t affect our daily lives.
Well, at some point they will affect our daily lives more based on current trends, but still. Even if you just don’t care about the growing amount of single-use disposables in our landfills and our oceans, we all know that bringing your lunch to work will be cheaper than buying it. At the very least, we can all get on board with saving some money, right?
2. Ditch Bottled Water
Yes, it is true that tap water can be compromised in some cases. One such case is local to my area, where Chemours has provided bottled water to families whose water supplies are potentially tainted by a chemical called GenX. Although more recently Chemours has pushed water filters as a solution, I can understand why people would want bottled water in this situation.
And those folks aren’t alone. The most recent EPA data I could find shows that 91.4 percent of water systems in the US meet all applicable health-based drinking water standards. Sure, 91.4 percent is pretty good, but that leaves a very rough 28 million people whose water system doesn’t meet federal guidelines.
I say “very rough” since it would be nearly impossible to figure out how many people are actually serviced by each one of these systems that don’t meet federal guidelines. So I did the next best thing and multiplied the population of the US by the remaining 8.6 percent.
You Have Options
All that said, even the aforementioned people have options. Even for them, bottled water is not automatically the one and only solution. In an interview with NPR, Elizabeth Royte mentioned that a good place to start in your approach is your right-to-know report or consumer-confidence report. These reports are required if you’re part of a community water system, and they will tell you what is in your water supply.
Once you know what is in your water supply, you can determine whether different types of filters would remove all potential contaminants. If something basic such as a Brita pitcher won’t get the job done, Royte mentioned reverse osmosis filters. These filters remove “nearly everything,” she says.
While these filters aren’t cheap, they can last an extremely long time – 10 to 15 years with regular maintenance, says Water Tech. That solution is quite obviously much cheaper in the long run than bottled water – not to mention creation far less pollution.
I realize this is a complicated situation, to say the least. Still, we shouldn’t assume that bottled water is the best or the only solution because that simply isn’t true. Do your research and you may find you have other options.
3. Use Public Transportation
I realize this is not an option for everyone, but if you have it, you should take advantage. Many commuter trains run on electricity, which is far more efficient than gas. Even the ones that aren’t electric are typically diesel-powered – still more efficient than gas.
It’s no secret that I like prefer electric forms of transportation over those that pollute the atmosphere. Yes, I have seen some debate over how much “better” electricity really is given that power plants burn coal and other pollutants in many cases. But I find these arguments counter-productive.
Electric trains are the most efficient means of transportation. Conversely, gasoline-powered cars are very inefficient. In addition, it’s much easier to regulate a few power plants than it is to regulate millions of vehicles. Thus, if we only have to regulate the pollution being done by the power plants, it’s much easier to control what enters the atmosphere.
And even if you ride a diesel-powered train or bus, the footprint is still much better. After all, diesel is already better than gas. Plus, you are “carpooling” in that scenario. By this, of course, I mean having only one vehicle for several passengers. Reducing the number of vehicles on the road will almost always create less pollution.
Oh, and I haven’t even mentioned the cost. In the interest of the theme of this post, I’d be remiss if I didn’t do so. Luckily, ThoughtCo. has already done that for me. Spoiler alert: yes, public transit is probably cheaper than driving.
4. Buy in Bulk
While I do not have a Costco membership myself, many people in the FI community do. And they swear by it. It may not make sense to have a membership if you are single or have a small family; for larger families, it might be worth considering.
I would guess that most of us are familiar with the idea of buying in bulk. You pay more up front but pay less per unit, making it cheaper in the long run. At the same time, although the profit margin is smaller per item, it still works as a business model since you are committing to buying more of them.
This is basically the same business model that makes Walmart so successful. They just sell more items in smaller quantities, but at a low cost with slim profit margins. What can we say – we like low prices.
Coming back to the idea of buying bulk: yes, the cost is lower in the long run. What we don’t often talk about, though, is the packaging. Consider toilet paper, for example. The reduction in waste may not be huge. But when you consider having to package four rolls compared to packaging 30 of them, you will inevitably use more plastic on seven or eight packs of four.
These small differences can really add up over time.
5. Switch to Shampoo Bars (in Bulk if Possible!)
This is a change I have not yet done myself, but I will in the near future. If you aren’t familiar with shampoo bars, they are very similar to the shampoo bars many of us know. But, of course, the formula is different so that they are better for washing hair.
Needless to say, this one lines up with the overall message here. Not only can buying shampoo bars in bulk be cheaper than buying shampoo bottles, but they are often packaged in paper. That means you eliminate a lot of the plastic you would normally be getting with shampoo bottles.
I haven’t checked my local options yet, but if you can buy them locally at a reasonable price, that also helps. Doing so means you are cutting down on packing materials, which yet again reduces waste.
Lastly, and this is just a bonus tip: I’ve read that if you use shampoo bars, you should get a well-drained soap dish. The reason for that is because if they sit in water, it speeds up the dissolving process. Getting a soap dish allows you to prevent wasting it.
The Environment (and Our Wallets) Will Thank Us Later
The environment is a complicated thing. Very complicated. Typically when we are done using things, we shove them in a corner of the world where they aren’t visible. Because they are sort of hidden, we won’t necessarily notice the effects of reducing waste immediately.
We won’t necessarily notice the effects of more pollution, either. But that isn’t an excuse. Plastic, styrofoam, and other packaging take many years to break down. Some of it is recycled, but most of it isn’t. And the reality is that reducing is generally a much more effective strategy than reusing.
No, I’m not saying we shouldn’t recycle. We should do that, too. But we should reduce first, and recycle what’s left.
Besides, our wallets will thank us – not just the environment. Even if the environment isn’t important to you, there are lots of ways you can save money with these small steps. And if saving money isn’t important to you, well, you’re in the wrong place.