Barista FIRE: Bridging the Benefits Gap

Barista FIRE: Bridging the Benefits Gap

Starbucks. Everyone loves it. From frappucinos to lattes, from chai tea to Refreshers, it seems no one can get enough.

Okay, fine – not everyone loves it. This post might be old, but most of these ideas are still relevant.

Love it or hate it, though, it would be tough to deny that Starbucks is a successful company. After all, they are the largest coffee chain in the world.

But aside from the drinks, what else is good about Starbucks? Well, they have over 21,000 locations. In order to have that many locations, they must employ a ton of people, right? And if they employe so many people, employee retention is certainly one of their biggest corporate goals.

Barista FIRE means being semi-retired but still working part-time, primarily to receive benefits.

Presumably, as part of that goal, Starbucks offers health insurance to all of its employees. That’s a big deal because most employees work part-time, and often part-time workers are not offered such benefits. In fact, one Reddit user said the insurance is the only thing preventing them from quitting.

Harsh words, no doubt, but it also highlights the level of value people place on their insurance through Starbucks. And that is central to the idea of Barista FIRE.

In case you hadn’t gotten to the definition of FIRE yet, it’s an acronym that stands for Financial Independence Retire Early. In the real world, it can take many forms, but the simple version is that returns from your investments cover your daily expenses (FI). RE, then, means leaving the corporate world.

Note that there is not a universally-accepted definition of FIRE. This is how I personally define it.

Related: Financial Independence Retire Early: What Does it Really Mean?

Where does Starbucks enter the equation? The idea is fairly straightforward. Because Starbucks offers health insurance, working for them would allow you to pay into a health insurance plan, potentially making your expenses much lower during your (early) retirement.

It’s worth noting that, at least for Starbucks, you must work an average of at least 20 hours per week to be eligible for health insurance. (Thanks to The FIRE Lane for pointing my attention to that little caveat.)

Perhaps unsurprisingly, Starbucks is not the only company that offers health insurance for part-time workers. But they do seem to be more well-known for this than most.

So, in reality, being “barista FIRE” does not necessarily mean working at Starbucks. A more accurate definition would be working part-time for the sake of having health insurance.

Barista FIRE: Why Not Just Use the ACA?

Let me preface this section by saying that I am not a health insurance expert. If you have ever been through open enrollment with your employer, you probably know these plans can be extremely complex and convoluted. Especially if you have multiple family members who need ongoing medical care.

That said, my brief research on the subject suggests that despite its name, the Affordable Care Act (ACA) is not as affordable as having health insurance through Starbucks.

For example, the Reddit thread above shows many users paying double-digit monthly premiums for their plans. I do realize relying on Reddit seems questionable, but couldn’t find any official information on premiums.

I also know that premiums are only one part of the cost, but for the ACA, it seems many people have premiums in the $300-500 range.

Barista FIRE certainly seems like a better deal when you look at it that way.

Again, I don’t want to delve too deeply into health insurance plans because they can get very complicated very quickly. But the fact that people choose to work at Starbucks primarily for the health insurance is telling.

Perhaps this barista FIRE thing is more than just a gimmick.

Anyone Have an Extra $5 Million?

Part of me loathes the fact that I continue to come back to this episode of Afford Anything – the recent one with Suze Orman. I hate it because I am at least 52% certain that Suze’s extreme stance is mostly meant to generate headlines. And generate headlines it did.

If you don’t have nearly 75 minutes to listen to the episode, the biggest takeaway was Suze saying you should have at least $5-10 million before you should even consider retiring early.

Again, I personally believe she just wanted to stir the pot. Still, I have heard many times the concern about health care costs increasing with age. That is especially true here in the US, where we spend more on health care than any other country.

Clearly, rising health care costs are a valid concern. I’m not going to sit here and pretend as though I have an easy solution, either. Many countries have free health insurance or at least much lower costs than we have.

A More Sensible Approach

Despite the above concerns, the good news is that we can build some average healthcare costs into our FI numbers. Suze may claim that we need several million to prepare for the worst, but the real average cost is around $200,000.

Your actual FI number may vary based on your annual expenses and risk tolerance, but I would recommend adding those healthcare costs into your number. So, if it was $1.3 million, it would now be $1.5 million.

In addition, working a part-time job that offers benefits can be great in terms of human interaction. If you are someone who would not fare well being alone all day, working part-time might be ideal for you.

Barista FIRE vs. Coast FIRE

Another benefit to barista FIRE is that it allows you to draw down less of your portfolio while being semi-retired. You may not be earning a full-time income, but you aren’t working for free, either!

This is in contrast to another term I heard recently, known as “coast FIRE.” Coast FIRE is what people more often have in mind when they think about retirement. The idea is that your investments grow to the point that you no longer need to earn any additional money. All of your expenses would be safely covered, including health insurance and medical needs.

So barista FIRE is that sort of semi-retired state where you continue to work but probably fewer hours, and perhaps no longer sit in an office all day.

I suppose deciding whether to opt for barista FIRE somewhat depends upon the type of work environment you prefer. But the fact that it would very likely mean fewer hours is something almost anyone can appreciate.

What do you think?

What are your thoughts on this? Do you know someone who is barista FIRE? Or perhaps there is another “hack” you know about that helps mitigate health insurance costs during early retirement?

  • 3
  •  
  • 9
  •  
  •  
  •  

This Post Has 12 Comments

  1. Woah. I wanted to be Barista FIRE’d before it was cool. My dream is to work in a local coffee shop part-time slinging lattes. Too bad it doesn’t pay enough. But maybe that is just more reason why I should start to pursue FIRE?

    1. Yeah, but you’re not as cool as me so…

      Seriously, that sounds like a great “post-corporate” life. Especially since local coffee shops beat Starbucks any day. 🙂 And yeah, definitely, if you were already FI, that would be a sweet gig.

  2. It is funny but discussion with several physicians in the past touched this subject where one planned to retire and work at Starbucks if health insurance became an issue. Would be a all time classic if something happened and someone asked if there is a doctor in the house and it turns out it was your batista.

    It definitely is a valid option for sure and who knows how many former white collar employees don’t mind donning the Starbuck uniform to get health care coverage

    1. Haha, that would be great if the “Is there a doctor in the house?” scene played out in real life. Also, it’s obviously good to hear from a physician that it’s a viable option. I may work in healthcare, but I’m sure you know more about that than I do.

  3. I don’t think I’d want to serve coffee for 20 hours a week though!

    I’ve got no better options for “easy” health insurance. But a motivated person could probably spend the 20 hours per week making more than $10 per hour. If you had a health plan that you could buy on the open market for $800 per month, 80 hours a month @ $20 an hour without benefits and pay for the plan themselves. You could make that much mowing lawns and get free exercise +listen to podcasts and audiobooks!

    It also seems like a benefit that could easily be cut for part-time workers in a down economy.

    I really enjoyed the post!

    1. That brings up an excellent point – I didn’t look into whether there is a minimum number of hours worked required to be eligible for health insurance. I know that is often the case. Perhaps I will look that up tomorrow and update the post! Also, I like that you are thinking outside the box on this as well. I’m sure this is not the only option, and it sounds like your example could definitely work, as well.

  4. I guess I’m at Barista FIRE at the moment, working only part-time/sporadically to cover my current low living expenses and allowing my portfolio to coast to my FI number in 5-8 years. I enjoy the socialising and activity of the work (in event work, rather than coffee), with minimal stress. Fortunately, I don’t have the same health insurance concerns as an Australian citizen!

    1. Oh hey, Michelle! Cool to see you here! The funny thing is my introverted self would probably get drained working at a coffee shop if it got really busy. Haha. That’s amazing that you are barista FIRE now. I wish I could say the same, but it’ll be a few years at least. And yeah, our health insurance situation is definitely not as good as yours – hopefully it will be approved in the next few decades, but it’s extremely complex, to say the least. Thanks for stopping by!

  5. I love the idea of Barista fire! I would love a part time low stress job that gives me time to focus on my passions. I think it’s doable within the next 3 to 5 years for me

    1. That is excellent. Wish I could say the same!

  6. Barista FIRE is the goal here. ANy job you love doing, is no longer a job! Slinging coffee while living off of passive income, reaping healthcare benefits, and getting a little side money! whats not to love. I think 5 million is a very conservative number. One that most people will not need in order to live a very fruitful life. But again, to him his own!

    1. Haha, 5 million is an extremely conservative number given that the vast majority of people could never hit that number no matter how hard they try!

Leave a Reply